Easy Jet discriminates against disabled passengers yet again

Dear Colleagues,

And yet another incident that shocks every person with reduced mobility.."Am I the next to be targetted?" The airliners continue to harrass and discriminate against persons with disabilities with their limited understanding. Its EasyJet this time. This is despite tall claims about what they offer to persons with disabilities/or with those having specific requirements at their website at link:   http://www.easyjet.com/en/planning/specific/index.html.

In June 2011,  they debarred a boy with disability for reason that his wheelchair was too heavy!  In another incident in December 2011, a blind women was not allowed by the airliner to board because she wasn't carrying the necessary documentation for her guide dog to fly (though the guide dog was wearing the official harness and collar tag!) The lady Ms. Joanna Jones had been flying for last 12 years with the guide dog! The excuses continue to amaze many of us each time! 

Not long ago, Easy Jet  was fined 60 thousand Ponds  for discriminating with three passengers with disabilities.  However, they don't seem to have learnt. Here is the recent incidence of January 2012.

Cambridge businessman thrown off flight "for being disabled"

14 January 2012

A Cambridge businessman was left feeling “degraded” and “demeaned” after he was thrown off a flight for being disabled.

Dr Martin Sabry

Dr Martin Sabry, 39, from Clarkson Road, has been in a wheelchair for 17 years after a mountaineering accident left him paralysed.

Since he founded his own technology company, aIDEAS, in 2005, he has traveled with different airlines every four to six weeks on business with no problem.

But when he went to board his easyJet flight from Gatwick to Montpellier, in France, last Wednesday (Jan 4) he was put through an ordeal that left him in utter shock and disbelief.

He said: “As I arrived at the easyJet check-in desk, I was handed a laminated safety card and asked ‘are you ok with that?’

“The card said: ‘Are you able to make your way to an emergency exit unaided?’

“I said yes and didn’t think much of it, but then I was asked the same question a further two times before I boarded.

“Once on the plane the purser said: ‘can you walk to the emergency exit?’

“I explained I am paralysed from the chest down and even though I am quite active, I cannot walk.”

With this Mr Sabry was escorted off the plane and made to wait in the walkway while all other passengers boarded.

He said: “I asked to see the captain and explained I had travelled with them hundreds of times before but the purser still refused to let me board or see the captain.

“As the other passengers were boarding he handed me the laminated card and asked me to read it aloud – it was extremely degrading.”

Mr Sabry was then told Ground Control said he could board, but the captain of the plane, even though it was not delayed, had overruled their decision and called for take off.

After the plane had left, Mr Sabry waited for around four hours to see easyJet managers who profusely apologised and put him on a flight first class to Toulouse, 500 miles from where he needed to be and paid for a taxi for the rest of his journey.

Mr Sabry, a previous winner at the Cambridge News Business Excellence Awards, arrived at his destination at midnight, 12 hours after he was due to be there.

He added: “It was so demeaning and unbelievable the way they treated me and the purser was obnoxiously rude.

“I am not new to being in a wheelchair, but if this had happened to me when I first became paralysed I don’t think I would ever have shown my face in public again.”

A spokeswoman from easyJet said: “We are very sorry to hear about any inconvenience or upset that was experienced by Dr Sabry on his recent flight.

“Safety regulations state that all passengers travelling alone must be able to make their way to an emergency exit unaided – it seems there was a misunderstanding regarding this [Mr Sabry was asked if he could walk to the exit].

“However staff offered every assistance to Dr Sabry to arrange his transport for the next available easyJet flight at no cost.”

The Disability Discrimination Act states that since July 2007, “it is illegal for an airline, travel agent or tour operator to refuse to allow a disabled person to board an aircraft when they have a valid ticket and reservation.”

Source: Cambridge News, UK 

Cathay Pacific discriminating against the disabled passengers

People with Disabilities protest against Airliner's discrimination

Nov 24, 2011

TAIPEI, TAIWAN: A group of disabled people gathered Wednesday at the Taipei office of Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific Airways (CPA) to protest the company’s move to reject a disabled passenger from a flight earlier in November.

Lin Yi-ru, who is wheelchair user, was scheduled to travel alone on a Cathay Pacific Airways flight from Taipei to Hong Kong on Nov. 2 and transfer to a Lufthansa flight for Munich, Germany for a seminar. However, after boarding in Taipei, Lin was asked to leave the plane because CPA thought she was not capable of taking care of herself.

It was pure discrimination, Lin stated, adding that CPA even neglected her after she had disembarked, which meant her itinerary was disrupted.

“It was very late. I kept asking CPA to arrange another flight for me, but I ended up taking a direct China Airlines (CAL) flight to Frankfurt instead,” she noted.

The group of protesters questioned why CPA ejected Lin from the flight if CAL allowed her to take the flight by herself.

In response to the protest, Ling Wei-chien, a marketing manager at CPA, said the incident had nothing to do with discrimination, pointing out that the company hired many disabled workers.

He explained that the decision to ask Lin to disembark was based on the company’s rule that if a passenger does not seem to have the ability to take care of oneself, the passenger must be accompanied by another person. Ultimately, Ling said, as Lin violated the rule, the decision was made to ensure aviation safety.

The manager said that the airline would apologize for not taking responsibility for Lin after she had disembarked, but insisted that the company’s decision was based on safety reasons.

Source: http://focustaiwan.tw

Reality Check by Hindustan Times on CAR and its implementation

Dear Friends,

Post the incident of Kingfisher denying equal rights to  a blind woman passenger covered in the earlier post on this blog, Hindustan Times did a reality check on all major airlines and a very sorry state of affairs appeared. None of the airline officials were found trained on dealing with the persons with disabilities in utter disregard of DGCA's  Civil Aviation Requirement on Carriage by Air of Persons with Disabilities and Persons with Reduced Mobility!

A few days back an  Air Ambulance (single engine) crashed in a residential colony in Faridabad, Haryana instantly killing 3 residents and 7 on board people including the pilots, doctors, attendants and the patient in comma! And DGCA confirmed that Apollo was running this services in violation of the DGCA's CAR which do not permit single engine planes for medical evacuation flights, though it permits single engine planes on domestic routes only.

DGCA has created a number of CARs which are available on its website. But does it have any monitoring mechanism that ensures that the rules/regulations are also implemented and when flouted, are dealt with a iron hand? If not then DGCA is going a defunct body with no control over the mandate that it has been given to handle. They need to pull up their socks before it is too late!

Subhash Chandra Vashishth

To read from source click here: Hindustan Times

No sight no flight?

HT City Correspondent, Hindustan Times
New Delhi, May 24, 2011

Even the skies don’t care for blind people in India. After Kingfisher Airlines recently made a woman get off a flight because she was blind, we ran a reality check on other domestic airlines and found that contrary to international practices, most carriers in India do not allow blind.


When we called the tele-booking counters for Jet Airways, Kingfisher, Spice Jet, Go Air and Indigo, requesting to book a ticket for a blind adult who would travel unaccompanied, all of the above refused.

While Jet Airways demanded that a co-passenger with sight accompany the passenger, the operator at Indigo’s counter insisted that a guide dog, along with a ‘moisture absorbing’ mat for it, is a must with the passenger. Kingfisher and Spice Jet, too, refused to allow such a passenger unless accompanied by an adult with sight.

Later, when we contacted the same airlines’ corporate offices for clarity on their rules, most spokespersons evaded the question or said they’ll revert after checking the rulebook. An Indian Airlines official, however, said, “We have escorts for blind passengers at the airport, and we’ve never had any complaints.” 

On May 10, Shabnam Mansoori, a resident of Ahmedabad, who was flying to Goa with her two minor sons, was taken off a Kingfisher Airlines flight at the Mumbai airport. The staff said she could not fly as she was blind. "I had flown the same airlines from Ahmedabad to Mumbai. Then why didn’t they let me take a connecting flight to Goa?” she asks. “The government must act to ensure that blind travellers are treated with dignity,” says Mansuri’s husband Sameer, who is also blind and claims to have faced a similar predicament earlier.
The ministry of Civil Aviation remained unavailable for comment 

Kingfisher Airlines discriminates against Lady Passenger with Visual Disability

Dear Friends,

If what we hear from the Mid Day coverage is true, this is yet another gruesome incident of discrimination & the inhuman, cruel and indecent behaviour of the Airlines crew (Kingfisher Airlines this time)  with a lady passenger with visual impairment and her two young children. Such incidents only go on to prove that Kingfisher doesn't spend much on the mandatory disability equality training of their staff and each time Mr. Vijay Mallya has to issue a public apology!  But is that the answer? Will a public apology undo the shock, torture and inhuman treatment meted out to a lady passenger with disability?

The Civil Aviation Requirement (CAR) on Carriage of Persons with Disabilities and Persons with Reduced mobility amply clarifies to all airlines in section 4.4 to conduct disability awareness training for all crew member before posting them and then a refresher course every three years. The extract of section 4.4 is as below:

"4.4         All airlines and airport management shall run program for their staff engaged in passenger handling e.g. cabin crew / commercial staff including floor walkers and counter staff etc. for sensitization and developing awareness for assisting passengers with disabilities. The training program shall be conducted at the time of initial training and a refresher shall be conducted every 3 years on the subject. Only such persons who have current course shall be assigned to handling disabled persons. The training program should interalia, include assisting disabled persons in filling up travel documents as may be required while providing assistance in flight."

This is mockery of their own CAR referred above as well as the Article 14 Part III of Constitution of India that ensures equality and not to forget the Persons with disabilities (Equal Opportunity,  Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act 1995 read with UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities to which India is a signatory. 

This is a worst example of how erratic &  deficient the services are when it comes to persons with disabilities. The Kingfisher website in their section on Special Needs Passengers, continue to insist on filling up MEDIF form and also insist for medical certificate from the Visually impaired or hearing impaired guests against all settled norms of Civil Aviation Requirement. The instruction on the website says: 

"We wish to make your travel experience as comfortable as possible. And we have special facilities for our guests with special needs. 

Visually impaired or hearing impaired guests: If you require meet-and-assist service, or if you need to be guided to or from the aircraft, please notify the booking agent and complete a MEDIF form or provide a medical certificate.

If there is any other special need with which you require assistance, please don’t hesitate to ask when you book your flight with Kingfisher Airlines. We will do everything we can to accommodate your needs"

Whereas, the CAR categorically mandates in section 5.1 

 "No Medical clearance or special forms shall be insisted from persons with disabilities or persons with reduced mobility who only require special assistance at the airport for assistance in embarking/ disembarking and a reasonable accommodation in flight, who otherwise do not require any additional assistance."

This incident has shocked the disability sector and this humiliation is shared by all of us. We treat this as a matter of grave concern and strongly condemn all such practices which exclude persons with disabilities or violates their equal rights at the whims and fancies of untrained ground staff. The senior management can no more escape with public apologies. Therefore, an immediate and stern action against the culprits is the need of the hour besides heavy penalties on the Airlife for this serious lapse to set a precedent. 

regards

Subhash Chandra Vashishth, 

Advocate Disability Rights, India

Here is the story covered by Mid Day

Click to read from Source: Mid Day

Kingfisher crew offloads blind woman with kids

By: Vedika Chaubey Date:  2011-05-21 Place: Mumbai

Airline makes them disembark from flight, leaves them unattended for nearly an hour and a half as aircraft takes off without them

A private airline made a blind woman and her two children disembark from her connecting flight to Goa and left them unattended for nearly an hour and a half while the plane took off without them.

Adding insult to injury, the airline's staff allegedly told the woman that she could not travel with two kids because she was blind.

Shabnam Mansuri (35) says the experience has made her realise the fallacy of thinking that she can be treated like everyone else despite her handicap.

On May 10, Mansuri was travelling with her sons Lukman (7) and 18-month-old Luftaan from Ahmedabad to Goa via Mumbai to meet her husband. Her tickets had been booked with Kingfisher Airlines.

"I boarded the Kingfisher flight from Ahmedabad and reached Mumbai, from where I was supposed to take a connecting flight to Goa. I had barely taken a seat in the connecting flight around 12.30 pm when a crew member came and asked me to follow him. He also asked me to take my cabin baggage and kids with me. Initially, I thought that he must be changing my seat, but realised something was amiss when he took me down some stairs," said Mansuri.

"I asked him why he was making me get off the plane but he refused to answer. When my kids and I got off, they closed the aircraft's doors and took off, leaving us standing there. One attendant told me later that I cannot travel with two kids as I am blind. I was shocked," she added.

She kept telling the attendant that she had two young kids and needed to meet her husband in Goa, but to no avail. Finally, close to 2 pm, a staff member came and told her that they would arrange for her to board a 4.40 pm flight to Goa.

"I did not want to bank on them anymore. I called my husband and he arranged for us to board another airline's 3.10 pm flight. My question is, how can they let me travel from Ahmedabad to Mumbai without any trouble and then say I cannot travel with two kids from Mumbai to Goa? I was travelling on the same airline in both cases," said Mansuri.

She said the experience was one of the worst she's had in her life. "I am blind but that doesn't mean they have the right to discriminate against me. I had paid the full fare and if they had some problems, they should have informed me before I boarded. My elder son is so traumatised by the incident, he says he does not want to fly anymore."

Husband reacts

Mansuri's husband, Samir, who is the Chairman of Blinds Dream, an NGO, wrote a letter to the airline to complain about the treatment meted out to her.

A portion of the letter states, "Kingfisher officials told my wife that if she thought they were cruel, she shouldn't travel with them anymore."

"What the Kingfisher staff did to my wife is shameful. They had done something similar with me in 2005 (see box) and I will not let them get away this time. They have replied to my letter but that is not enough. I will take this issue to the consumer court and will go to the Supreme Court if need be. This is an insult to me and my family and I will not tolerate it under any circumstances," said Samir.

He alleged that he had come to know that his wife was made to disembark because of a VIP booking at the last moment, which led to the flight being overbooked. "If their company cannot handle blind people, they should declare that visually challenged people are not allowed to fly Kingfisher," he added.

The Other Side

When MiD DAY contacted Kingfisher Airlines, they said they regretted the incident. Prakash Mirpuri, vice-president, corporate communications, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, said, "We are investigating the matter. In the meantime, we would like to convey our deep regret for the inconvenience that may have been caused inadvertently to our valued guests."

Earlier too

Dr Samir Mansuri, Shabnam's husband and a celebrity doctor who is also blind, had allegedly been insulted by Kingfisher Airlines in 2005 as well. According to Samir, he was travelling from Mumbai to Ahmedabad that year.

"I was first in the queue to board the flight, but I was made to wait till all the other passengers boarded. When I went inside, they forced me to visit a washroom outside the aircraft even when I did not want to go. They said they were doing that so I would't have to visit the airplane's loo when we were airborne. The crew told me that they could not allow me to use the aircraft's washroom as I am blind and there were female crew members on board," said Samir.

"I felt insulted and raised the issue in the media. Vijay Mallya then issued an apology for the indecent behaviour on the airline's part," he added.

Bamboo wheelchair to make metal detectors stay calm at Air Ports Security

Hi,


Persons with disabilities especially those who use wheelchairs for mobility have some reason to smile! Every time they passed through the Airport security the security devices and metal detectors would start buzzing the moment the wheelchair passed through them and then followed a very rigid regime of examination, questions and physical inspection. It was often humiliating and embarrassing!


Soon it may be done away with- provided Indian agencies also adopt it.  DGCA and aerodrome operators have to take lead to make this happen. We have a National Mission on Bamboo Applications (under Department of Science & Technology) Govt of India and Bamboo development Boards across states which can emulate this remarkable idea and build around this technology.


Here is what Japan Airlines has done. It has developed a bamboo wheelchair for use at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport in an effort to speed up security checks. This wheelchair allows passengers to pass through metal detectors at security gates in the airport more smoothly. Without causing the metal detectors to go off, traveling might become a little easier in the near future for people with disabilities. The frame of wheelchair is made entirely from bamboo with rubber tires and carbon wheels. Completely handmade, each wheelchair costs some ¥600,000($7,167). The project is partially financed by donations from celebrities, including baseball commentator Norihiro Akahoshi, a former Hanshin Tigers outfielder who suffered serious damage to his spinal cord while he was a player.


The Airline and a workshop in Oita Prefecture, which is known for bamboo production, worked on developing the chair together. The wheelchair has no materials made of metal and is 90 percent bamboo, including the brake gear. The parts which aren’t made of bamboo are the shock absorbers,  tires, wheels, and axles which are made of reinforced plastic. The chair has been proven to be quite comfortable and has passed endurance tests. The development of the chair has taken four years, and each chair is hand-crafted.


To have a look at how this wheelchair looks like and for further reading:  click on link Bamboo Wheelchair Eases Airport Security   

AirAsia capitalizes on its slogan "Now every one can fly"

Dear Friends,

Its encouraging to know that equitable and dignified flying for the elderly and those experiencing disability is now a major plank for not only CSR activities but also a way to giving boost to the airline business. AirAsia takes lead by representing at a Regional Conference of APCD. Read more on this news item in Travel Monitor section of Bangkok Post

Now everyone can really fly

(To read from the source click here)

Known more for its marketing genius than the quality of its low-cost seats, AirAsia again outpaced its rivals earlier this month by becoming the only travel-industry company to be represented at a regional conference on facilitating accessibility for people with disabilities (PwDs).

Although all airlines facilitate travel by PwDs, AirAsia has been faster at capitalising on the marketing and corporate social responsibility benefits of this service as an intrinsic part of its "now everyone can fly" marketing slogan.

With an estimated 400 million people suffering from disabilities in Asia Pacific, half of whom women, and 58 million in the Asean countries, the market opportunity is clear. As most PwDs also travel along with a care-giver, the prospective revenue stream doubles.

Although CEO Tony Fernandes himself did not make the presentation at an Aug 19-20 meeting on South-to-South Cooperation on Disability, he was robustly featured in its various slides, addressing and mingling with several beaming PwDs in wheelchairs.

The meeting was organised by UN Escap in cooperation with the Asia-Pacific Development Centre on Disability (APCD), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the Ministry of Social Development and Human Security.
The objective was to assess progress made by countries in implementing the projects and programmes under the second Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 2003-2012 and to look into the prospects of initiating a Third Decade.

Tanin Kraivixien, the APCD president, said that for the first time, the focus of this year's meeting was the Asean sub-region in order to help create a sub-regional mechanism to cooperate in developing legislation and policies related to equal opportunities and inclusive development for PwDs.

He added: "The Asean sub-region can be a model sub-region to promote disability and development policies and legislation."

Noting that the APCD has more than 1,000 ex-trainees and approximately 200 associate organisations in Asia Pacific, Mr Tanin said that this year's meeting was "epoch-making since the social business sector has been invited to join."
AirAsia was represented by Kenneth Chan, chief for guest services, along with representatives from the Mall of Asia in Manila, Standard Chartered Bank, amongst others.
Mr Chan acknowledged that AirAsia's policies when it first began operations were not all inclusive. Guests with reduced mobility were not appropriately catered for. However, after representatives from organisations of people with reduced mobility met with AirAsia to challenge its "everyone can fly" slogan, the airline admitted it had been wrong and decided to fix it.

The result was an "inclusive" policy that seeks to boost the human capital development of staff as well as enhance the services and facilities offered to passengers. The airline also decided to "champion the cause of guests with reduced mobility with government authorities, airport management, ministries, etc."
Stressing that a lot more can be done by the region's airports to install better facilities and services for PwDs,

Mr Chan said AirAsia "engages in constant dialogues with organisations representing people with reduced mobility to gauge travel needs and requirements - these may change with the course of time, and we have to be very up to date to render the best services."

Nanda Krairiksh, director for social development of Escap, hailed the contribution of key innovators from the private sector who had been invited to offer their expertise and share their experiences.

"Viewing persons with disabilities as contributors to our region's economic dynamism as entrepreneurs, employees or an emerging market segment not only helps to change outmoded stereotypes that we are all fighting against but also enhances everyone's prospects for prosperity," she said.
There are many challenges still to be addressed: "How can we work together to develop inclusive societies that deliver the best services and products and increase accessibility overall for persons with disabilities? How can we serve as mentors and models of change for others?," she asked.

Tackling complex problems requires innovation, "which is best achieved when many minds are strategically working together in an atmosphere of mutual trust, where yesterday's strangers are transformed into tomorrow's allies.

"While many existing laws, policies, plans and schemes might adopt ideal and inspirational language, significant implementation gaps, in terms of statements on what should be done and what is actually done, exist. Hence addressing this shortcoming, whether in the context of discrimination or the provision of accessible environments, remains a crucial area for action if measures are to effectively cater for the needs of persons with disabilities."

Escap's priority is to promote the adoption and ratification by all countries of the landmark UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which entered into force on May 3, 2008. So far, 88 countries have ratified the Convention worldwide.

Meanwhile, the first New Zealand Conference on accessible tourism, travel, and hospitality for people with disabilities and seniors will be held in Auckland on Oct 4 this year.

Further details: http://nztri.aut.ac.nz/accesstourismconference/index.html

Access violations at your own peril

Dear Friends,

Exemplary penalty of $500,000 has been imposed on AirTran  by the Department of Transportation’s Aviation Enforcement Office for continued violations of the rights of the passengers with disabilities in terms of The Air Carrier Access Act of 1986. The Act requires airlines to provide assistance to passengers with disabilities in boarding and deplaning aircraft, including the use of wheelchairs, ramps, mechanical lifts or service personnel where needed.

U.S. Department of Transportation rules also require carriers to respond within 30 days to written complaints about their treatment of disabled passengers, and to specifically address the issues raised in the complaint. In addition, airlines must submit annual reports to the Department on disability-related complaints from passengers, noting the type of disability and nature of the complaint.  However, it was revealed that the airliner not only failed to provide boarding assistance but also did not give proper response to the complaints of the passengers nor filed proper annual reports required by the rules.

Here is the coverage:  (Click here to read from source)


AirTran Fined for Violating Rules Protecting Air Travelers with Disabilities

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) today assessed a civil penalty against AirTran Airways for violating rules protecting air travelers with disabilities.  The carrier was assessed a civil penalty of $500,000, of which up to $200,000 may be used to improve its service to disabled passengers beyond what is required by law.

“People with disabilities have the right to expect fair treatment when they fly, and we will continue to take enforcement action when their rights are violated,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.

The Air Carrier Access Act of 1986 requires airlines to provide assistance to passengers with disabilities in boarding and deplaning aircraft, including the use of wheelchairs, ramps, mechanical lifts or service personnel where needed.  U.S. Department of Transportation rules also require carriers to respond within 30 days to written complaints about their treatment of disabled passengers, and to specifically address the issues raised in the complaint.  In addition, airlines must submit annual reports to the Department on disability-related complaints from passengers, noting the type of disability and nature of the complaint.

An investigation by the Department of Transportation’s Aviation Enforcement Office of disability complaints filed with AirTran and DOT revealed a number of violations of the requirement for boarding assistance.  In addition, the carrier’s complaint files showed that it frequently did not provide an adequate written response to complaints from passengers.  AirTran also failed to properly categorize disability complaints in reports filed with the Department, the Aviation Enforcement Office found.

Of the $500,000 penalty, up to $60,000 may be used to establish a council to help the carrier comply with federal disability rules and hire a manager for disability accommodations.  Up to $140,000 may be used to develop and employ an automated wheelchair tracking system at AirTran’s major hub airports within one year that will generate real-time reports of the carrier’s wheelchair assistance performance.

http://www.tinyurl.com/2fjpdnl